Picture
Former Greenwich resident Briggs Baugh, who recently won the Recycling Pioneer award from the Connecticut Recyclers Coalition for his decades of service, is seen at his home in Stamford. Baugh, who makes sculptures out of recyclables, was the first chairman of the Greenwich Recycling Advisory Board.
Though nearly four decades have passed since then-Greenwich resident Briggs Baugh spearheaded the town's recycling program, he said his friends still hail him as the uncontested "garbage czar."

Settling into his armchair amid clutter of a week's recyclable goods awaiting pickup, the bespectacled Baugh, now living in Stamford, recounted Earth Day 1970 as the genesis of his commitment to the environment. At the request of the first selectman, he coordinated a humble volunteer effort that year to recycle cans and paper goods in collaboration with Greenwich High School, then translated it into a mission for town recycling.

"The thing about pioneers is that, when you're ahead of the pack, you get arrows in your back," said Baugh. "When I started advocating for recycling, my friends thought I was a nutcase because recycling hadn't yet appeared on the scene."

Though his labors to develop a recycling program were a "frequent uphill battle," said Mary Hull, executive director of Greenwich Green & Clean and a longtime friend, Baugh eventually helped his hometown become one of the state's best recycling communities.

The Connecticut Recyclers Coalition, which educates and advocates for improved recycling, recently honored Baugh's achievements with its Recycling Pioneer award.

"He was very creative and ahead of his time," Hull said. "He was really an innovator who was doing stuff that no one had thought of before. People said recycling would never happen, but he got people excited about the future."

One of his most significant contributions was his formation of the Greenwich Recycling Advisory Board, which created a drop-off center for recyclables and continues as an advocate for the town's environment. He served as its first chairman and published its quarterly newsletter, "GRAB Bag," which explained the process of recycling after 1987 state legislation made it mandatory. He also negotiated a deal with Marcal Paper Mills to form a mixed paper drive that saved the town over $1 million, he said.

"Greenwich has tended to be a forerunner in recycling," said current board Chairman Sally Davies, who cited Baugh as a driving force behind innovation in the town's recycling. "One of the amazing things about Briggs is that he is as excited about recycling as he was 40 years ago. He has such enthusiasm."

The town's recycling program now continues to modernize, having switched last August to a single-stream system in which all recyclable goods are mixed into a collection truck and sorted at a resource recovery facility.

Patrick Collins, assistant superintendent at the Holly Hill facility, said single-stream has nearly doubled recycling in Greenwich -- 977 tons were collected from blue bins this February, compared to 527 tons in February 2011.

Baugh said he is heartened by how his successors have continued his mission of sustainable living. "There is a greater appreciation for the treasure of our planet."

Baugh exercises his enthusiasm for recycling at home by leaf composting in his backyard and creating art from recycled bottle caps.

"At his house, you can't eat at his dining room table because it is full of recycled products that he doesn't want to throw away," Hull said, laughing.

While Baugh never anticipated becoming a leader in Greenwich recycling, he said he eagerly took on the role when he realized that his plans had the potential to significantly reduce waste and do a service to the environment.

"When there's a new idea, somebody has to be a voice for it," Baugh said.


Read more: http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/local/article/Garbage-Czar-Greenwich-native-a-recycling-3547203.php#ixzz1uTiDvRNo 
 
Picture
Image Source: http://atyourservice.seattle.gov/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Garbage-Truck.jpg
Seattle is considering picking up garbage only every other week as a way to save money and boost recycling, and would start with 800 households this summer. 

By Lynn Thompson
Seattle Times staff reporter


Seattle is considering picking up garbage only every other week as a way to save money and boost recycling.

The city hopes to start a six-month pilot project in July involving 800 households in four demographically diverse neighborhoods. If the test proves successful, the every-other-week garbage collection could be extended citywide, although that wouldn't happen until 2015 because of labor contracts.

"We've dramatically reduced the amount of stuff we send to the landfill. We think there's an opportunity to do more," said City Councilmember Richard Conlin. He also cited reduced truck traffic and carbon emissions as potential benefits of the change.

The City Council would have to approve temporary rates for households in the pilot neighborhoods. The committee that oversees utilities will take up the issue Tuesday, but full council approval isn't expected until May.

Seattle Public Utilities officials say the test neighborhoods will be selected by mid-May. Residents in those areas must participate, but they will get a $100 stipend to offset any costs associated with the every-other-week collection, such as a larger can because of the less-frequent pickup.

The trial period will involve testing two different rate structures. The utility's goal is not to make money on the potential change but to cover its costs.

The city first floated the idea for every-other-week garbage collection in August 2010, with the pilot planned to start up last year. But the project stalled as city officials weighed the potential savings — $6 million a year — versus the operational challenges of making the change.

Utility officials say the experiences of other jurisdictions that have already gone to every-other-week collection, including Portland, Renton and Olympia, have been positive. But those cities have different rate structures and populations.

"There's no way to predict our own customers' subscription behavior," said Tim Croll, solid-waste director for Seattle Public Utilities. He said SPU would follow up to evaluate customer concerns, costs and changes to recycling patterns.

"It's not clear-cut. There's savings, but is there enough savings to make it worthwhile?" Croll asked.

Several surveys done by the utility since 2006 show that about half of Seattle residents are open to the prospect of pickup every two weeks, while half are unenthused, Croll said.

Among residents' concerns were smelly garbage standing for an extra week, a higher cost associated with a larger can, and the risk that if they forget to put out the garbage, it would be a month between pickups.

Croll notes that Seattleites have successfully diverted tons of food and yard waste from their garbage already. "Organics," as the compostables also are called, would still be collected every week.

But city officials acknowledge there are still some smelly things that can't be recycled or composted — disposable diapers and pet waste, to name two.

The pilot would run over the hottest months of summer and the most trash-intensive months of the Christmas holiday, Croll said.


 
City will rely on education program rather than costly test program 
A pilot program to disperse bear-resistant trash bins in neighborhoods near Boulder's foothills has been scrapped because the budget would only allow for 33 homes to be outfitted with the costly receptacles -- and that's too small of a sample to be effective, according to city officials.

Instead, Boulder leaders plan to spend $10,000 on an educational campaign this spring -- one that will include going door-to-door to ask residents to take a "bear pledge" signaling their intention to secure their trash to prevent bears from rummaging through it, according to a city memo on the Black Bear Urban Wildlife Management Plan.


Each bear-resistant container costs roughly $225, according to the memo, which would mean the bins would be provided for just one or two city blocks. And, since bears' foraging patterns have varied from year to year, there's no guarantee they'd be highly active in the areas where the secured bins were being tested.

At the same time, officials with trash hauler Western Disposal aren't too enthusiastic about the bear-resistant bins, saying they haven't picked up in popularity among Boulder residents.

The bins resemble traditional containers but feature an inner locking mechanism that can be flipped open with a fingertip, said Western Disposal spokesman Dan Powers. And while they've proven effective, he hesitates to call them entirely "bear-proof."


Living with bears 
Black bears are curious and will east almost anything. Here's a few tips for preventing bears from visiting your neighborhood:

1. Secure your trash

2. Remove bird feeders

3. Keep barbecues clean

4. Keep pet food indoors

5. Keep garage doors closed

6. Secure windows and doors

7. Be responsible about trash and bird feeders

8. Don't leave food or trash inside your vehicle

9. Pick fruit before it ripens, clean up fallen fruit

Source: City of Aspen and Pitkin County 

A few years ago, the trash-hauling company purchased 200 of the bear-resistant bins for $40,000, said Bryce Isaacson, vice president of sales and marketing. But only 87 Boulder residents have purchased the bins -- which also cost $10 extra a month to service because it takes truck drivers longer to collect from the bins since they need to be manually opened.

"People are interested in them until they find out it costs more -- then they don't want them," Isaacson said. "The city is backing away because to go out and buy all those carts for just a small area is not economically justifiable."

A large-scale bear study in Durango includes a $250,000 budget for the distribution of bear-resistant trash bins this spring.

Valerie Matheson, Boulder's urban wildlife coordinator, said the city is interested in hearing from residents who already have the bear-resistant trash bins.

Concerns about bears

But the focus of the city's plan for dealing with black bears has shifted to be more about education. The efforts will target homes south of Arapahoe Avenue, east of Ninth Street and north of Baseline Road. Officials will begin visiting households in late April.  

Wildlife officials have reason to be concerned about bears foraging in trash cans as rangers have reported finding scat with traces of cigarette butts, aluminum foil and other household items, Matheson said.




 
Share this page
February 12, 2012
By Kate Linthicum and Jessica Garrison, Los Angeles Times

A war over trash is about to break out at Los Angeles City Hall. And the ensuing lobbying is expected to be long and costly, with the outcome potentially affecting residents, businesses, workers and a quarter-billion-dollar-a-year industry across the city.


The opening clash is set for Monday, when labor and environmental groups will square off against waste haulers and business interests to determine how trash is picked up from tens of thousands of the city's businesses and large apartment buildings.

City workers run the largest trash collection system in the nation, serving more than a half a million single-family homes and 220,000 small apartment buildings. But large apartment buildings and businesses are a different story. For generations, private trash haulers have vied for a share of the $224-million-a-year waste collection market there and at factories, schools, strip malls and office towers.

Now, a labor-allied group wants to reinvent that system by assigning exclusive commercial and apartment trash pickup rights to a handful of top bidders in 11 newly drawn franchise zones. City sanitation officials support the plan, which the Board of Public Works will take up Mondaybefore it begins moving through the City Council vetting process.

Union and environmental groups say the new system would increase recycling and ease traffic and pollution caused when hordes of heavy trucks from competing companies crisscross neighborhoods to serve scattered customers. They say it would also ensure safer, more humane working conditions for thousands of truck drivers and those working in rank recycling and trash-sorting facilities.

"It's about accountability," said Greg Good, who is pushing the issue for the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy, a group tied to organized labor. "The more companies operating, the less information the city has, the less accountability."


 
Written byJENS MANUEL KROGSTAD
Allison Peterson’s heart sank last week when she discovered her lost iPhone was in the bowels of a garbage truck zigzagging through her Waukee neighborhood.

While her phone’s GPS chip helped her locate the lost device, it was the kindness of the trash collectors that got the phone back into her hands.

The tale begins on Friday, when Peterson couldn’t find the iPhone she had had for about six months. It didn’t take her long to figure out that it most likely had fallen out of her pocket and into an old green recycling bin she had tossed.

Peterson, 39, had the foresight to download a free “Find My iPhone” app to her computer. She clicked on the app and then watched as the blip moved through her neighborhood.

She quickly dashed out of her house to track down the garbage truck. When she found the truck, driver Brent Klaassen stopped his route and called the phone, which later was discovered to have had its ringer turned off.

Klaassen then offered to let Peterson look for the phone at the landfill. While Peterson turned her nose up at that idea, she did call her husband, Mark, to see if he would sift through the trash.

“Once she told me that it would cost around $700 to replace the phone, I said I’d drive up and see what I could do,” said Mark Peterson, who with his wife, has five children.

Several workers for Metro Waste Authority and Waste Management helped Mark Peterson search for the phone Friday, a frigid day.

“The actions of these folks saved me a large amount of money, got me some brownie points with my wife … and made me appreciate how people who didn’t even know me, had nothing to gain, and probably thought I was crazy, took the time to help,” Mark Peterson, 46, wrote in a two-page thank-you letter.

Klaassen and his co-workers have been through similar situations. In their business, people sometimes call in a panic about lost diamond rings, wallets and other valuables.

What made this situation unique is that the owner immediately located her phone through the GPS chip. This gave Klaassen time to separate the trash from the rest of the landfill, said Reo Menning, spokeswoman for Metro Waste Authority.

“If this had been dumped with all the other trucks delivering the garbage, there’s no way this would have been found,” she said.

On the second pass through the pile of trash with a bulldozer, the men spotted the old green recycling bin.

The workers unfolded the container, which had been flattened by the trash compactor, and found the iPhone. The screen was free of scratches and cracks, though there was a slight bend in the body of the phone.

Mark Peterson, by this time giddy with joy, picked up the phone and dialed his wife.

“I found it,” he said.


Article from http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20120125/NEWS/301250051/-1/becker_trial/Pricey-cellphone-carted-off-by-garbage-truck-recovered-landfill
 
JANUARY 9, 2012 
BY HEATHER CARR 
Article from Eat Drink Better blog

On “The Big Waste”, four Food Network chefs prepare a multi-course feast for one hundred people with waste food. Anne Burrell, Bobby Flay, Alex Guarnaschelli, and Michael Symon groan when they hear the challenge. Garbage? Unfortunately, they find it’s very easy to produce a large feast from the food that’s wasted each day.

Typical of Food Network shows, the four chefs are competing in teams to see who can come up with best recipe from a limited selection of foods. They can only use ingredients on their way to the trash. According to the show, 40% of food in America goes uneaten – 200 pounds per person per year. Food waste is a big problem.

Waste in Food Preparation and DistributionAlex and Anne start at Ferrara Bakery, where they find that the ends of deli-sliced meat and grinds of coffee and cocoa are thrown away. Flour on the outside of rising dough is swept off and thrown away instead of being reused or repurposed.

Bobby and Michael go to Manhattan Food Exchange, where fresh produce that looks fine to my eye is being thrown out. The owner of the store points out peas with lighter green spots on the pods. He takes the chefs to the back of the store and shows them carrots with bumps and radishes with wilted greens. All this is food that we would love if we pulled it out of our own gardens.

The next place Alex and Anne go to is a seafood distributor. He’s stuck with returned orders because of party cancellations and other reasons and, in some cases, fish with slightly discolored flesh that are still fresh. As a distributor, he can’t find a new buyer before the fish goes bad. Any delay of delivery can mean that he’ll lose a large stock of fish.

Bobby and Michael continue on to a butcher. They find beef bones and organ meats that are going to be thrown away. They make the obvious decision and take those home for broth and stock.

All the food has to pass inspection by a food inspector. He meets them back at the kitchen and tests all the animal products for temperature. Everything passes, except the prosciutto, which Anne decides to take home and feed her family.

Dumpster Diving with a FreeganNext up, Anne Burrell spends an evening with a freegan. A freegan dumpster dives for food. After stores close, they throw away the food that will expire the next day or just to make room for the next day’s inventory. The segment shows an astonishing amount of fresh veggies and prepared food in the garbage.

It’s a great idea to reduce waste, but with one caveat: you really have to know what you’re doing to pull food out of the garbage and eat it. Earlier in the day, the chefs were looking at food pulled from produce stands. Once food goes into the garbage, you don’t know if the raw produce has had contact with raw meat. A store might have thrown out that prepared food because they found a problem with the preparation and decided it was unsafe, not just “old”.

Waste on the FarmThe next day, the chefs head out to various farms and produce stands. Rick at Lawrence Farm Orchards says that 40 to 50% of his food is wasted. His pick-your-own farm has a lot of food lying on the ground and he says this is because people pick a head of cabbage or a tomato and then see one they like better, so they throw the first one on the ground.

At the other farms, the same thing happens. The piles of fresh produce that are being wasted are beautiful, but sad.

The Chicken and the EggBut what was even more sad was amount of chicken and eggs wasted. Chickens are thrown out just because of appearance. They show one where the wing is broken, but the rest of the chicken looks fine. If I were roasting a whole hen, it would matter. Most of the time, though, when I buy a chicken, I’m just going to cut it up anyway.

Eggs are thrown out because of size. The ones that are too big can’t fit in the carton. The ones that are too small wouldn’t stay put and might break in the carton. They’re just as useful in making bread or scrambled eggs, but they never make it to market.

The last fifteen minutes of the show focus on the competition and the dishes the chefs produce from the waste foods. By now, I’m sure you realize that their options are really unlimited. They’re pretty much the same as if they had shopped in the grocery store for the food.

The Big Waste” will show again on Food Network at 4 p.m. Eastern Time on January 14.

Image of produce via Shutterstock

 
By Christopher Rosacker
Staff Writer 

A festive holiday season can bring families together in picturesque settings, often with lots of food and gifts to exchange. 

But all this travel and extra activity produces a lot of waste.

“We see more trash because people come in for the holidays and people are cooking more,” said Daria Kent, a recycling technician at the McCourtney Road Transfer Center.

Grass Valley and Nevada City dump trucks picked up three tons more waste on the Monday and Tuesday following Christmas than on those same days' averages during the rest of the year, reported Waste Management spokesman Justin Caporusso.

On Dec. 12, Waste Management collected around 40 tons of garbage locally, but collected 59 tons two weeks later on the Monday after Christmas, Caporusso said. 

Nationwide, Americans throw away 25 percent more trash between Thanksgiving and New Year's as compared to any other time of the year, according to Waste Management. Traditionally, the extra waste amounts to about 1.2 million extra tons per week — or an extra 6 million tons during the entire holiday season.

Although waste collection services see more waste on their routes, landfills don't necessarily see the spike. 

Last year, approximately 945 tons of solid waste material was deposited in the week prior to Christmas at the McCourtney Road Transfer Center, according Bob Elder, operations manager of the western Nevada County landfill. 

Although that number is 45 tons more than the typical 900-ton weekly average, Christmas week sees a drop in disposal of waste, Elder said. Last year's Christmas week only saw 697 tons deposited at the landfill, followed by 850 tons the subsequent week.

“Weather dictates a lot of people's dropping off,” Elder said, adding that many who generally deposit waste at the landfill may travel, or don't work during the week between Christmas and New Year's. 

Elder said this year's December total numbers are not yet tabulated and were not available Friday, but he doesn't anticipate them to deviate from the norm.

While regular solid waste may not be so heavy during the weeks people typically celebrate the December holidays, recyclable drop offs do spike, Elder reported.

For the month of December 2010, 1,347 ton of recyclables were brought to the McCourtney Road Transfer Center, where as October of that same year only totaled 1,108 tons, Elder reported. 

“It's really mostly about packaging material, cardboard and Styrofoam,” Kent said.

On Dec. 12 and 13, Waste Management collected 91 tons of recyclables, which jumped to 96 tons on Dec. 26 and 27, Caporusso said.

“This is the third year we have not bought any Christmas wrapping supplies,” wrote Nevada City resident Ann Hobbs in a note to The Union. “We continue to re-use both paper (in good shape), ribbon, bows and make our tags out of Christmas cards. It's not a big savings, but it isn't as if its single use makes it unusable or dirty.”

Another seasonal spike is the legal disposal of pharmaceuticals at safety bins at places such as the Grass Valley Police Department and Kmart, Kent said. 

“People are lightening their load for the first of year,” Kent said. “There just seems to be more awareness of it heading into the New Year.”

To contact Staff Writer Christopher Rosacker, e-mail [email protected] or call (530) 477-4236.  
Article from: http://www.theunion.com/article/20120102/BREAKINGNEWS/120109990/1001&parentprofile=1053 
 
By Jim Johnson | WRN senior reporter

Nov. 29 (Bristol, Vt.) -- Pat Palmer´s trash collection vehicle runs only on two horsepower.Real horsepower, that is.

Their names are Jerry and Jake, a pair of dapple gray Persheron draft horses that wind their way through Bristol every Friday morning, pulling a wooden trash collection wagon designed to look like a sleigh.

Clip-clop, clip-clop – the sound of the horses´ shoes hitting the asphalt serves as a rhythmic soundtrack to what has become a 14-year tradition in this quiet town of about 3,750 people.

Palmer and helper Lynda Malzac are familiar faces to those along their route, where residents put out an average of about 150 bags of trash each week for collection. But they are not the stars of the show.

On a recent Friday, a woman from California was out snapping photographs, saying that there´s no such service where she lives – hardly a surprise.

At another point, a father and infant daughter waited patiently by their bags of trash with a bribe.

Would a plate of cookies be enough to allow them to jump on board for a little ride along the trash route? Sure enough.

"A lot of people just want to ride for the fun of it. A lot of townspeople do it," Palmer said. "It´s fresh air. I think it´s very calming. The outside of a horse is good for the inside of a person, and that´s not an original quote."


Read the rest of this article here! http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/headlines2.html?cat=1&id=1322579103
 
Garbage? Poetry? Redemption? These ideas aren’t usually linked together. But out of the heap arose Garbage, A.R. Ammons’s 1993 book-length poem. Read the book review and author interview here: http://www.curatormagazine.com/lindsaycrandall/garbage-as-poetry/